My first two months at the school, I’ve been in the 1st grade
of Primary School classroom under the supervision of Mª Amparo, my tutor. The
group is composed of 17 students (9 boys and 8 girls), in which we can find different
learning paces. Especially, there are 3 students (2 boys and a girl) that are
unable to do the same activities that the rest of the class since they have not
acquired yet the necessary literacy. So, they don’t follow the textbooks as
their classmates, but the teacher prepared for them materials adapted to their
necessities, mainly focused on the learning of the letters, syllables and some
short words, the knowledge of the numbers from 0 to 20 and the main operations
like addition and subtraction.
As you can imagine, Mª Amparo’s job is not easy, as she
has to attend these kids, while she also attends the big group. So, when I
arrived she asked me to sit down with these three kids and work with them the communication
skills. And this has been basically what I’ve done during these two months.
At first, it was a hard task for me, since I didn’t know
how to make these kids learn to identify the letters with the sounds, and to join
them to make words. So, I helped them to do the textbook that they follow named
“Ven a leer” (Come to read). This book consists pretends to make students learn
the letters and the syllables by the repetition of some words with the same
sounds. For example, papa, pipa, pupa, pila…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db164/db1642d9b09300269fcac28548fe5ec53930d760" alt=""
It was not easy for me, because my expectations were
too high. I thought that with my help they were going to do a big progress in a
short period of time. But this did not happen, and we had to repeat always the
same things, since they forgot all what we had seen from one day to another.
So, I started to feel very frustrated because I didn’t know what could I do to
help them, and I thought that the work I was doing was totally useless. Sometimes,
the kids also felt frustrated as I asked them too much. Finally, I understood
that we have to settle down real objectives for us and for students to avoid
frustrations.
The real problem is that these kids don’t receive all
the attention they need, as there aren’t enough teachers to cover all students’
different needs. They receive support from the Therapeutic Pedagogy and the Support
teacher every day, but there are some times during the day when they are not properly
attended because of the lack of teachers to do it. And the situation is getting
worse with the new law, as the ratio per classroom has increased to 30
students. So, if it’s impossible with 17 students, I cannot imagine with 30.
![]() |
Schedule |
Turning to the subject of my experience at 1st
grade classroom, and talking now about the big group, I’ve detected a general
lack of reading comprehension. I
think that this ability is not properly developed, and that some teachers don’t
give it the importance that deserves. The textbooks don’t help since most statements
are confusing, and the activities are always the same and organized the same
way, so they don’t promote the reading comprehension. In Maths, for example, we
also find a lack of problem solving exercises.
Despite all this, they have a reading corner with a
lot of books, but they only use it when they finish the activities, so normally
they only have time to see the pictures. They also take a book home every Friday
to read it during the weekend with their parents. On Monday, they have to hand a
very simple record card where they only have to say if they have liked the book
or not, and to do a little summary. This is a good way of creating a reading
habit (if parents help), but I think that they should do at least one hour a day
of aloud reading in groups in class, and oral exercises of reading comprehension
about the lecture.
I would also like to talk about the hegemony of textbooks in schools. I
think that following a textbook from such a young age is not recommended, apart
from unnecessary. And it’s not only because most of them are not well planned
and don’t propose good activities, but because using them determines the methodology
follow by the teacher. Normally, it is a traditional methodology in which the
teacher is the knowledge transmitter, and students are just passive receivers.
So, ultimately, the success or the failure of the process depends mainly on the teachers’
skills and personality and their ability to attract students’ attention and
confidence. It’s also a very unfair way of teaching, as it doesn’t consider students' different levels and learning rates as they have to do the same things at the
same moment.
However, there are thousands of recourses and materials
more appropriate to reach a meaningful learning, but that implies more time of
preparation, and a greater commitment from teachers, who are not always
disposed to spend some of their free time to create and adapt new materials.
Another resource that could be very useful, if it was
used right, is the use of the ICT (Information
and Communication Technologies). Regrettably, although the school has enough material
resources to do it (interactive whiteboards, computers, etc.) they don’t make a good
use of them. For example, the interactive whiteboard acts as a projector of the
textbook. It is, as I’ve already mentioned, because following a text book
determines a methodology, so at the bottom everything remains the same.
Learning to make a good use of the ICT is something
essential for the future generation. The Internet is a new source of resources for
learning that we are not taking into account yet in the classrooms, because
children develop better the ICT skills at home with their tablets or their
parents’ mobile phones than in class, where the only thing they do is to look a
screen and, sometimes, play interactive games.
Another problem of the introduction of the ICTS in the
classrooms is that, sometimes, they don’t work properly, slowing the pace of
the class. Furthermore, most of the teachers are not enough prepared to use
them and, therefore, to teach them.
Finally, I would like to highlight the importance that
the social background and families have
in the correct development of children. I’ve checked how, in most of the cases,
children that receive support from their families and that have a balanced and
peaceful social background have better results that the ones who are not as
lucky. School is supposed to mitigate these social differences, but there are
certain cases in which this work is very difficult or even impossible. For
example, there is a kid in 1st grade classroom whose parents, are
separated and he lives one week with his mother and another with his father. The
week that he is staying at his father’s house, he arrives to school awake,
concentrated, clean, with a snack for the playtime, etc. But the week that he
is staying at his mother’s house, it is the opposite. Some days his mother
falls asleep and he arrives late at school (if he arrives), he comes dirty and with
the same clothes than the day before, sleepy, etc. So, that week is very
difficult to work anything with him.
You have brought interesting issues to the fore. I too feel that the LOMCE poses even more obstacles in the way of an adequate pedagogical orientation. It makes it even harder for teachers to actually create a learning community in their classrooms where different psychological, social realities and cultural capitals (Bordieu) are harmonized, which is a near-to-impossible task in the first place. Textbooks, rigid timetables, standardized tests, etc., make it impossible for the teachers to meet the main educational challenge. The reason for this may be that all these factors lead them to reproducing only one kind of academic experience in class, which is actually a private learning experience—a student alone and in front of a coursebook written with a very specific child in mind. This kind of experience would be difficult to reproduce for every single child even if the coursebooks were appealing and interesting, so imagine what the outcome is when superficial and weird coursebooks are used, as it is mostly the case. The alternative should be to create a classroom academic experience where every student is allowed to share his or her voice, and where the teacher can reorient and channel this choir of voices towards in-depth analysis.
ReplyDelete